Legal Opinion
Le Font v. Rankin
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 29, 1959No. Civ. 23289PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VALLÉE, J.
Appeal from an order denying the claim of defendant James H. Morrison for an exemption of half of his earnings, averred to have been received by him for his personal services rendered within 30 days of the levy of an attachment.
The complaint, filed November 9, 1955, alleged a common count for money had and received. On filing the complaint, plaintiff filed an affidavit for a writ of attachment alleging Morrison was indebted to plaintiff on an implied-in-law contract for the direct payment of money. A writ of attachment issued and was served on a number of banks the following day.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bertozzi v. SwisherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Petrich v. FrancisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Carter v. CarterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Fay Securities Co. v. BoweringCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
3Cited by7 opinions
- Randone v. Appellate DepartmentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- People v. SullivanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Sourcecorp, Inc. v. ShillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Ehman v. MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Los Angeles County Court Reporters Ass'n v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.