Legal Opinion

Los Angeles County Court Reporters Ass'n v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 6, 1995No. Docket Nos. F020351, F020597PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DIBIASO, J.

On February 2, 1993, cross-appellants and respondents the Los Angeles County Court Reporters Association and the Los Angeles County Employees Association, Local 660 (collectively the association), filed a petition for writ of mandate in the Los Angeles Superior Court naming appellant and cross-respondent the Los Angeles County Superior Court (the court) as defendant. The petition challenged the court’s practice of using electronic recording devices rather than certified court reporters to make a record of general civil proceedings where neither the assigned judge nor the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bailey v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Edmiston v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. People v. CaseyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  4. People v. Van GordenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  5. In Re ArmstrongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. California Court Reporters Ass'n v. Judicial CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  2. Randall v. MousseauCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  3. Randall v. MousseauCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API