Legal Opinion

Petrich v. Francis

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 12, 1927No. Docket No. 4338PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWorks, P. J.

Plaintiff, to secure the payment of an anticipated judgment in his favor upon the claim upon which he brought suit, caused a garnishment to be served upon a corporation which had in its possession money payable to defendant Santich. The latter made claim that the money was exempt from execution and the trial court sustained his contention. Plaintiff appeals from the order made in that behalf.

The order finds its sole support in an affidavit made by Santich, which showed only that he claimed the exemption because the money constituted “the earnings of affiant earned and acquired by him as a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. BorchertSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  2. Murphy v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Swanz v. ClarkMontana Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Bradford v. SargentCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  2. People v. ForbathCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  3. People v. ThompsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  4. Brodsky v. California State Board of PharmacyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  5. Bertozzi v. SwisherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API