Legal Opinion
Hilborn v. Soale
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 4, 1919No. Civ. No. 3039PublishedCited by 15 opinions
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Lewis R. Works, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. .
1Opinion of the CourtSloane, J.
[1] The title to the property involved in this action was conveyed to the defendants and appellants, Carl B. Soale and Wilson H. Soale, her husband, by the following deéd:
“Grant Deed.
“Bertha E. Hookway and Wiliam R. Hookway, her husband, in consideration of ten dollars to them in hand paid, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, do hereby grant to Carl B. Soale and Wilson H. Soale, her husband, as joint tenants with the right of survivorship, all that real property situated in the city of Pasadena, county of Los Angeles, state of California, described as follows: Lot twenty-eight (28)…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Barnett v. BarnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Swan v. WaldenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Jacobs v. All Persons, Etc.California Court of Appeal · 1909
3Cited by15 opinions
- Gwinn v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Rauer's Collection Co. v. HigginsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Zeigler v. BonnellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Hammond v. McArthurCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- American Oil Co. v. FalconerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.