Legal Opinion
Kosnar v. J. C. Penney Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided February 3, 1959PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
The only questions presented to us are the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain such two findings. The appropriate rule then for the appellate court is expressed in Olson v. Milwaukee Automobile Ins. Co. (1954), 266 Wis. 106, 109, 62 N. W. (2d) 549, 63 N. W. (2d) 740, as follows:
“It is the well-recognized rule that when a jury’s findings are attacked, particularly when they have had the trial court’s approval, our inquiry is limited to the issue whether there is any credible evidence that, under any reasonable view, supports such findings. With the rule in mind we consider that it is…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Olson v. Milwaukee Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
- Boutin v. Cardinal Theatre Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
- Lundgren v. Gimbel Bros.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
- Rogers v. J. C. Penney Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1934
- Becker v. LiscioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
3Cited by13 opinions
- Turk v. H. C. Prange Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Maus v. CookWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
- Gould v. Allstar Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- Cook v. Food Lion, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
- Wallow v. ZupanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.