Legal Opinion

Wallow v. Zupan

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1967PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHanley, J.

A verdict should only be directed against a plaintiff where plaintiff’s evidence, giving it the most favorable construction it will reasonably bear, is insufficient to sustain a verdict in plaintiff’s favor. Baumgarten v. Jones (1963), 21 Wis. (2d) 467, 124 N. W. (2d) 609; Rudzinski v. Warner Theatres (1962), 16 Wis. (2d) 241, 114 N. W. (2d) 466; and Schlueter v. Grady (1963), 20 Wis. (2d) 546, 123 N. W. (2d) 458.

Therefore, we deem it only necessary to set forth the evidence favorable to plaintiff.

Defendant’s tavern had two entrances — a front and a side entrance. Plaintiff chose to use the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Boutin v. Cardinal Theatre Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Rudzinski v. Warner Theatres, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Morey v. Lake Superior Terminal & Transfer Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Baumgarten v. JonesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Jaeger v. Evangelical Lutheran Holy Ghost CongregationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Schuh v. Fox River Tractor Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  2. R. T. Madden, Inc. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Nelson v. L. & J. PRESS CORP.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Menges v. Depuy Motech, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1999
  5. Olson v. Sentry Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1968

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API