Maus v. Cook

Appellant’s sole contention is that the jury’s apportionment of causal negligence is without support in the evidence. Therefore, appellant asks this court to determine as a matter of law that plaintiff’s causal negligence was at least equal to that of defendant — which would compel a reversal of the judgment and dismissal of the complaint — or that we remand the cause for a new trial to enable another jury to better satisfy appellant in the comparison of the causal negligence of the respective parties.

There is evidence from which the jury could believe and obviously did believe that the…