Legal Opinion

Gould v. Allstar Insurance Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1973No. 470PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*360Heffernan, J.

Plaintiff’s complaint charged defendant, Denoon Beach, Inc., with common-law negligence and also with violating its duties under the safe place statute, sec. 101.06, Stats, (renumbered sec. 101.11 by ch. 185, Laws of 1971). The defendant concedes that the defendant’s beach was open to the public for the defendant’s profit, that the plaintiff paid a fee for admission to the area, and that the location was “a place of employment” under the safe place statute. It is, accordingly, undisputed that under the facts Gould was a “frequenter” at a place of employment. Sec. 101.06, Stats.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Young v. Anaconda American Brass Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Zehren v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Scheeler v. BahrWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Widell v. Holy Trinity Catholic ChurchWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Heiden v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. DePratt v. West Bend Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Owen Orthmann v. Apple River Campground, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  3. Gross v. DenowWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Megal v. Green Bay Area Visitor & Convention Bureau, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Dowen v. HallAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API