Legal Opinion
Reilley v. McIntire
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 7, 1938No. Civ. 5978PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
This is an appeal from an order granting plaintiffs a new trial after judgment for damages had been rendered in their favor in an automobile casualty ease. The motion was granted on the ground that the amount for which the verdict was returned is inadequate to compensate the plaintiffs for the damages suffered. It is contended the trial court abused its discretion in granting the new trial.
The plaintiffs are husband and wife. As the result of a collision between the automobiles of plaintiffs and the defendant, Mrs. Reilley was seriously injured. The plaintiffs joined in this suit for damages.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Smith v. RoyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Peri v. CulleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Phillips v. LyonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Taylor v. Northern Electric Ry. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1915
- Franklin v. BettencourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Dept. of Public Works v. DonovanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- McNear v. Pacific Greyhound LinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Collier v. LandramCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- Blackmore v. BrennanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Hawkinson v. OesdeanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.