Collier v. Landram
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
Two suits for the reasonable value of services performed by sisters of Mary Collier, deceased, were consolidated for the purpose of trial. In spite of the fact that the court found the deceased did not agree to pay either of the plaintiffs “the reasonable or any other value for such services,” judgments were rendered in their favor. Sara B. Collier was awarded the sum of $400 and costs, and Lillian Collier was given the sum of $200 and costs. From those judgments the plaintiffs perfected appeals. The administrator of the estate has not appealed.
The appellants contend that the findings are not…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kennedy v. IsenbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Nylund v. MadsenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Murdock v. MurdockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
- Reeves v. VallowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Newbert v. McCarthyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Estate of ReinhertzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Cummins v. CumminsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Patterson v. RoweCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Smith v. HageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Estate of CooperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.