Legal Opinion
Hawkinson v. Oesdean
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 10, 1943No. Civ. No. 13936PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOOD (Parker), J.
Defendant appeals from the order granting plaintiff’s motion for a new trial. The motion was granted upon the sole ground “that the verdict is against the law.”
The action was for damages for personal injuries sustained *714by plaintiff, a pedestrian, when he was struck by an automobile operated by defendant. The accident occurred about 9:55 p. m. on December 18, 1941, in the proximity of the intersection of Hollywood and Cahuenga Boulevards. Hollywood Boulevard extends east and west, and Cahuenga Boulevard extends north and south. The traffic at that intersection was controlled…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Hatfield v. Levy BrothersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Kauffman v. MaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Dempsey v. Market Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1943
- Brumagim v. BradshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
- Gray v. RobinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Boynton v. McKalesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. McCulloughCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Rosenberg v. WittenbornCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Renfer v. SkaggsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Los Angeles Fire & Police Protective League v. RodgersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.