Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Copson

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided July 11, 2005PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCowin, J.

The Commonwealth appealed from the allowance of the defendant’s motion to dismiss an indictment charging him with breaking and entering in the nighttime with intent to commit a felony. The defendant successfully argued before a Superior Court judge that dismissal was required under the Interstate Agreement on Detainers (Agreement), St. 1965, c. 892, § 1, because the Commonwealth failed to bring him to trial within 180 days of having received his pro se motion for a speedy trial. He filed the motion while incarcerated on a Federal charge in another State. We granted the Commonwealth’s…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. United States v. MauroSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Cuyler v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Carchman v. NashSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Anderson v. YungkauSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. United States v. Michael DentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WallaceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2015
  2. State v. Roderick R. MangumIdaho Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. Commonwealth v. MaloneMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2005
  4. Commonwealth v. ThompsonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018
  5. Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API