Legal Opinion

UAH-Hydro Kennebec, L.P. v. State Tax Assessor

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided June 14, 1995PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERTS, Justice.

UAH-Hydro Kennebec, a Maine limited partnership, appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court (Kennebec County, Chandler, /.) affirming a use tax assessment. UAH argues that bascule gates attached to a dam at its Winslow hydroelectric facility qualify for the production exemption from use tax pursuant to 36 M.R.S.A. § 1760(31) (1990). We agree, and accordingly vacate the judgment.

UAH owns a hydroelectric facility on the Kennebec River near’ Winslow on land leased from Scott Paper Company. The plant is a run-of-the-river facility, which means that the flow of the river…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Riley v. Bath Iron Works Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
  2. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. WanamakerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
  3. City of Ames v. State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1955
  4. Jackson Advertising Corp. v. State Tax AssessorSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1988
  5. Cincinnati Gas & Electric Co. v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Stromberg-Carlson Corp. v. State Tax AssessorSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
  2. Community Telecommunications Corp. v. State Tax AssessorSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
  3. Foster v. State Tax AssessorSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
  4. SST & S, INC. v. State Tax AssessorSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
  5. Maine Yankee Atomic Power Co. v. State Tax AssessorSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API