Legal Opinion

Advance-Rumely T. Co., Inc. v. Jacobs

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1931No. 5720PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBudge, J.

—Appellant sold and delivered to respondents a tractor and one set of five and one-half inch spade cleats (such equipment being hereinafter referred to as a “tractor”) and thereafter respondents executed and delivered to appellant two promissory notes in payment thereof and secured said notes by chattel mortgage upon said tractor. Upon respondents’ failure to meet the payment as stipulated in said notes and mortgage, appellant declared the entire indebtedness due and proceeded by notice and sale to foreclose the chattel mortgage. Under such foreclosure the tractor was sold at public auction…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Bridger v. . GoldsmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  2. Jackson v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
  3. Williams v. BedenbaughSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  4. Sharkey v. Burlingame Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Haight v. . HaytNew York Court of Appeals · 1859

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Ernst & Young, L.L.P. v. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Bates v. SouthgateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  3. Pittman v. SatherIdaho Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Angerosa v. White Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
  5. State v. AndersonIdaho Supreme Court · 1960

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API