Legal Opinion

Jackson v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1924PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hubbs, P. J.:

On November 27, 1908, the claimant’s predecessor in interest entered into a unit price contract with the State for the construction of a section of the Barge canal four and eighty-four one-hundredths miles in length. The contract was known as Barge Canal Contract No. 40. The claimant, after the completion of the contract, duly filed a claim for damages against the State. The Court of Claims allowed certain items of the claim, but refused to allow interest on such items. From the part of the judgment refusing to award interest the claimant has appealed. The Court of Claims also…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hollerbach v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. United States v. Atlantic Dredging Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. Faber v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  4. Brassil v. . Maryland Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1914
  5. Bridger v. . GoldsmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1894

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. Danann Realty Corp. v. HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
  2. Martens Chevrolet, Inc. v. SeneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
  3. Souza & McCue Construction Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  5. Hersey Gravel Co. v. State Highway DepartmentMichigan Supreme Court · 1943

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API