Legal Opinion

Kane v. Kulongoski

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 14, 1994No. SC S41020, SC S41022, SC S41024PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*596GILLETTE, J.

In these original proceedings, consolidated for argument and decision, petitioners make various challenges to a ballot title certified by the Attorney General for a proposed initiative measure. Pursuant to ORS 250.067(1), each of the petitioners submitted to the Secretary of State timely written comments on the earlier, proposed ballot title, and each is entitled to bring these challenges to the certified ballot title. ORS 250.085(2), (5). On review, we modify the ballot title certified by the Attorney General in the particulars set out below.

The proposed initiative measure is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Zimmerman v. ZimmermanOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Hand v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Glerum v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Aughenbaugh v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Deras v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1990

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Nakamoto v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Hamilton v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Kane v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Nakamoto v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API