Legal Opinion

Securities Investor Protection Corp. v. Stratton Oakmont, Inc.

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York

Decided September 24, 1997No. 18-14014PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION GRANTING MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY AND DENYING MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER

TINA L. BROZMAN, Chief Judge.

Harvey R. Miller, Esq., as trustee (the “Trustee”) for the liquidation of Stratton Oakmont, Inc. (“Stratton”) under the Securities Investor Protection Act of 1970, asks me to resolve a discovery dispute with Daniel Porush (“Porush”), a former principal of Stratton. On the basis of a joint defense privilege, Porush is objecting to the discovery sought by the Trustee pursuant to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 2004.

I

Stratton was a retail securities brokerage company with which…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. WeintraubSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. United States v. Martin SchwimmerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
  3. In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated November 16, 1974District Court, S.D. New York · 1975
  4. Ohio-Sealy Mattress Manufacturing Co. v. KaplanDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1980
  5. In re Sunrise Securities LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Boyd v. Comdata Network, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2002
  2. Wellin v. WellinDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2016
  3. Sanders v. GardnerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1998
  4. In Re Mirant Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 2005
  5. United States v. AgnelloDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API