Legal Opinion

In re Sunrise Securities Litigation

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 31, 1989No. MDL No. 655PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

O’NEILL, District Judge.

This multidistrict litigation arises out of the insolvency of Sunrise Savings and Loan Association (“Sunrise”). Three groups of claims have been consolidated for pretrial proceedings in this district: state common law and Securities Exchange Act of 1934 claims asserted by Sunrise shareholders (the “Securities case”); fiduciary duty claims asserted by the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation (“FSLIC”) in its corporate capacity (the “Fiduciary Duty case”); and state common law and civil RICO claims asserted by former Sunrise depositors (the…

2Cases cited69 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Douglas Oil Co. of Cal. v. Petrol Stops NorthwestSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Wachtel v. Health Net, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
  2. United States Ex Rel. Pogue v. Diabetes Treatment Centers of America, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2002
  3. Sandberg v. Virginia Bankshares, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
  4. Henry v. Champlain Enterprises, Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 2003
  5. VersusLaw, Inc. v. Stoel Rives, L.L.P.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2005

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API