Legal Opinion
United States v. Agnello
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided March 27, 2001No. 00 CR 205 NGRMLPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
GERSHON, District Judge.
The government seeks an order compelling attorneys Jeffrey Lichtman, Esq. and Marvyn Kornberg, Esq. to testify in the grand jury regarding certain conversations each had with defendant Carmine Agnello. All concerned parties, including Mssrs. Lichtman and Kornberg, neither of whom presently has an attorney-client relationship with Agnello, have had an opportunity to be heard. Agnello does not dispute that he waived his attorney-client privilege by testifying, and offering Lichtman’s testimony, at his bail hearing as to certain conversations he had with Lichtman and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. WeintraubSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- In Re: Grand Jury Proceedings United States of America v. John DoeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Martin SchwimmerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces TecumCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Boyd v. Comdata Network, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2002
- Maplewood Partners, L.P. v. Indian Harbor InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2013
- In Re Grand Jury ProceedingsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- Yemini v. GoldbergNew York Supreme Court · 2006
- Ol Private Counsel v. OlsonDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2024
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.