Legal Opinion
Wellin v. Wellin
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided September 30, 2016No. Nos. 2:13-cv-1831-DCN, 2:13-cv-3595-DCN, 2:14-cv-4067-DCNPublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DAVID C. NORTON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
The following matter is before the court on a Report and Recommendation (“R <⅞ R”) by Special Master William L. Howard regarding non-party movant Dr. Ann Plum’s (“Plum”) motion for a protective order. ECF No. 370.1 For the following reasons, the court adopts as modified and rejects in part the R & R, and grants in part and denies in part Plum’s motion for a protective order.
I. BACKGROUND
Because the parties are well-acquainted with this litigation, the court will provide only a brief recitation of the underlying facts and focus on the matters…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Seattle Times Co. v. RhinehartSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Contravest Inc. v. Mt. Hawley Insurance Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2017
- Aikens v. Cianbro CorporationDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2022
- Barnett v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2021
- GOOSE CREEK PHYSICAL MEDICINE, LLC v. BECERRADistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2024
- Garcia v. QuevadoDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2022
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.