Legal Opinion
In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated November 16, 1974
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 18, 1975No. M 11-188PublishedCited by 76 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
CONNER, District Judge:
On July 15, 1975, two attorneys associated with Hogan & Hartson, Esqs., a Washington, D.C.-based law firm, appeared before a Special Grand Jury that was charged with investigating suspected securities manipulations by International Controls Corp. (ICC) and Investors Overseas Services, Ltd. (IOS). In response to a subpoena duces tecum dated November 26, 1974, the Hogan & Hart-son attorneys submitted all documents described in the subpoena to be marked for identification as Grand Jury exhibits. The attorneys nonetheless refused to cede certain of those…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. United Shoe MacHinery CorporationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1950
- United States v. Louis KovelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Served Upon Simon HorowitzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by76 opinions
- Mead Data Central, Inc. v. United States Department of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Robert McPartlinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
- United States v. Martin SchwimmerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- In re LTV Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1981
- In Re the Regents of the University of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.