Legal Opinion
Bravia Capital Partners, Inc. v. Fike
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 22, 2013No. 09 Civ. 6375(JFK)(KNF)PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*138MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
KEVIN NATHANIEL FOX, United States Magistrate Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Before the Court is defendant Maryanne Fike’s (“Fike”) application, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37, for an award of the reasonable attorneys’ fees she incurred in making her motion to compel plaintiff Bravia Capital Partners, Inc. (“Bravia”) to make disclosures in response to her discovery demands. Bravia opposes the application, contending that the attorneys’ fees Fike seeks are not reasonable.
BACKGROUND
On October 23, 2012, during a telephonic conference, the Court entertained arguments from…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Arbor Hill Concerned Citizens Neighborhood Ass'n v. County of Albany & Albany County Board of ElectionsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- New York State Association for Retarded Children, Inc. v. Hugh L. Carey, Individually and as Governor of the State of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Millea v. Metro-North RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Zirogiannis v. Seterus, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2016
- Jiles v. Rochester Genesee Reg'l Transp. Auth.District Court, W.D. New York · 2018
- Alvarez v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2023
- Arenson Office Furnishings, Inc. v. KopelmanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021
- Barrows v. Brinker Restaurant CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2020
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.