Legal Opinion

Barrows v. Brinker Restaurant Corporation

District Court, N.D. New York

Decided March 30, 2020No. 5:19-cv-00144Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ________________________________ SAVANNAH BARROWS et al., 5:19-cv-144 Plaintiffs, (GLS/ATB) v. BRINKER RESTAURANT CORPORATION, d/b/a CHILI’S GRILL & BAR, Defendant. ________________________________ SUMMARY ORDER Defendant Brinker Restaurant Corporation, doing business as Chili’s Grill & Bar, has moved to dismiss pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and (6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and compel arbitration pursuant to the Federal Arbitration Act.1 (Dkt. No. 15.) For the reasons that follow, the motion is denied with leave to renew.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Bensadoun v. Jobe-RiatCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  3. Interocean Shipping Company v. National Shipping and Trading Corporation and Hellenic International Shipping, S.A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
  4. Almacenes Fernandez, S. A. v. GolodetzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
  5. Sphere Drake Insurance Limited v. Clarendon National Insurance Company and Clarendon America Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API