Legal Opinion

Castle v. Schulman

California Supreme Court

Decided July 13, 1948No. L. A. 20228PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

This is an appeal by the plaintiff from an order granting a new trial in an action to quiet title to a lot in the city of Los Angeles. Findings and judgment had been made and entered in favor of the plaintiff. The defendant’s motion for a new trial was granted on the ground that the decision was against law. The facts were stipulated.

On, February 26, 1931, the treasurer of Los Angeles County issued bond No. 170, Los Angeles County Improvement No. 499, covering the lot the title to which is the subject matter of the action. That bond thereupon became a lien on the property. The plaintiff…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lee v. SilvaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Page v. W. W. Chase Co.California Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Woodill & Hulse Electric Co. v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Wood v. BradyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Fox v. California Title InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Thibodo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
  2. Ramirez v. RamirezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  3. Montgomery v. County of Contra CostaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  4. Margraf v. HartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API