Legal Opinion
Ramirez v. Ramirez
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 19, 2011No. D058284PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*339Opinion
McCONNELL, P. J.
Rochelle A. Rand, ARC (Rand), appeals a family court order that requires her to sign a document to relinquish a family law attorney’s real property lien (FLARPL; Fam. Code, § 2033, subd. (a)),1 which is recorded against her former client’s community property interest in real property. Rand contends the order must be reversed because it is based on an earlier order to extinguish the FLARPL, which is void because she was not joined as an indispensible party to the proceeding or even given notice of it. We agree, and reverse the order under review to the extent it requires…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bank of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Fraser-Yamor Agency, Inc. v. County of Del NorteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Droeger v. Friedman, Sloan & RossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Wilson v. BevilleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Lezine v. Security Pacific Financial Services Inc.California Supreme Court · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Marken v. Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Turkanis v. PriceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Marriage of BittensonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
- Marriage of Palacio and Ayala CA5California Court of Appeal · 2020
- Soroush-Azar v. Palmer CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2013