Legal Opinion

Fox v. California Title Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 28, 1932No. Docket No. 8062PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.

Plaintiff sued to quiet title to real property and had an interlocutory judgment giving defendants the right to redeem the property from a previous sale. Defendants declined to redeem and a final judgment was entered for plaintiff. The defendants appeal on typewritten transcripts from both judgments.

Plaintiff, when owner of the property, mortgaged the same to one Olsen in the sum of $2,500, and then sold to McDonald for $6,250 subject to the mortgage. McDonald assumed the mortgage and delivered to Fox a promissory note in the sum of $3,250 as part of the purchase price. This note was secured…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Carpentier v. BrenhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
  2. Anderson v. AlexanderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Diamond Benefits Life Ins. Co. v. TrollCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. Citibank, N.A. v. Oxford Properties & Finance Limited, James S. Lee and James S. Lee & Co., (Guam), Ltd. v. Citibank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  3. Arabia v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, L.P.California Court of Appeal · 2012
  4. Castle v. SchulmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Robin v. CrowellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API