Legal Opinion

Montgomery v. County of Contra Costa

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 16, 1965No. Civ. 22179PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDevine, J.

— Plaintiff, respondent, east his claim of rights against the County of Contra Costa into the forms of suit for declaratory relief and for the impressing of a constructive trust and petition for writ of mandate. The facts are agreed upon. The problem is one of law only, and it is this: When a taxing authority has collected, by tax sale of real property, a surplus above the amount of its lien, may the holder of an unforeclosed 1911 Improvement Act bond recover a pro rata share in the proceeds or, alternatively, the surplus above the tax lien to be applied to the account of his bond on the same…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Los Angeles County Flood Control District v. HamiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Scheas v. RobertsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. City of Inglewood v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  4. La Mesa Lemon Grove & Spring Valley Irrigation District v. HornbeckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Anaheim Sugar Co. v. County of OrangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. County of San Bernardino v. FlournoyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  2. MARION DRIVE, LLC v. SaladinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  3. Opinion No. (2002), California Attorney General Reports2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API