Montgomery v. County of Contra Costa
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtDevine, J.
— Plaintiff, respondent, east his claim of rights against the County of Contra Costa into the forms of suit for declaratory relief and for the impressing of a constructive trust and petition for writ of mandate. The facts are agreed upon. The problem is one of law only, and it is this: When a taxing authority has collected, by tax sale of real property, a surplus above the amount of its lien, may the holder of an unforeclosed 1911 Improvement Act bond recover a pro rata share in the proceeds or, alternatively, the surplus above the tax lien to be applied to the account of his bond on the same…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Los Angeles County Flood Control District v. HamiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Scheas v. RobertsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- City of Inglewood v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- La Mesa Lemon Grove & Spring Valley Irrigation District v. HornbeckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Anaheim Sugar Co. v. County of OrangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- County of San Bernardino v. FlournoyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- MARION DRIVE, LLC v. SaladinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Opinion No. (2002), California Attorney General Reports2002