Page v. W. W. Chase Co.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion. Knight & Heggerty, and William M. Madden, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the Court
HARRISON, C.
Action to quiet title.
At the trial of the cause it was shown on behalf of the plaintiff that Rosalie M. Sehwarze became vested with the title to the land in question on April 20, 1867, and that on March 19, 1900, she conveyed it to the plaintiff by a conveyance which was recorded in the office of the county recorder on April 2, 1900. The habendum clause of the deed contains the following: “subject to any existing liens for street-work.” In its answer to the complaint the defendant alleged that on October 26, 1900, the superior court of San Francisco, in an action upon a street…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Biddel v. BrizzolaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- Crall v. Board of Directors of Poso Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- McDonald v. McCoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Reeve v. KennedyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- Boskowitz v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Dougherty v. California Kettleman Oil Royalties, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1937
- MacDermot v. HayesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Cook v. Stewart McKee & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1945
- Crouch v. H. L. Miller & Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
- Holt Manufacturing Co. v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.