Legal Opinion

Young v. Flood

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 6, 1990No. Docket 107700PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of no cause of action entered upon a jury verdict finding that defendants were not negligent. We affirm.

Plaintiff’s action arises from a December 28, 1983, automobile accident in which the vehicle driven by defendant Kimberly Flood, and owned by her father, defendant Kenneth Flood, skidded on ice, crossed the center line, and collided with plaintiffs pickup truck. Kimberly testified that she was returning home from work, recognized that the roads were slippery and snow-covered, and was traveling about thirty miles per hour when she hit an icy patch and lost…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Zeni v. AndersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Reetz v. Kinsman Marine Transit Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Moore v. SpanglerMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Vander Laan v. MiedemaMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Leonard v. HeyMichigan Supreme Court · 1934

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Stitt v. Holland Abundant Life FellowshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001
  2. Vsetula v. WhitmyerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Kingsbury v. MarcinekDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API