Legal Opinion

Kingsbury v. Marcinek

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided May 29, 2020No. 2:19-cv-13063Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION RONALD KINGSBURY, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 19-CV-13063 vs. HON. BERNARD A. FRIEDMAN PROGRESSIVE MICHIGAN INSURANCE COMPANY, DAVID MARCINEK, and OMI TRANSPORTATION, INC., Defendants. ____________________________/ OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS This matter is presently before the Court on the motion of defendants David Marcinek (“Marcinek”) and OMI Transportation, Inc. (“OMI”) for judgment on the pleadings [docket entry 22]. Plaintiff has not responded, and the time for him…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Commercial Money Center, Inc. v. Illinois Union InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  4. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. WingetCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  5. Southern Ohio Bank, Under the Will of Virgil A. Diperna, Deceased v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API