Legal Opinion

State v. Anderson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 3, 2010No. 0612343CR; A135502PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.

Defendant was charged with two counts of felon in possession of a firearm, ORS 166.270. Before trial, he demurred to the indictment, arguing that the state was required to allege and prove that he knew that he was a felon at the time that he possessed the firearms. The trial court disallowed the demurrer, and defendant was convicted on stipulated facts. Defendant now appeals, assigning error to the trial court’s disallowance of his demurrer, reiterating the arguments he made before the trial court. For the reasons explained below, we affirm.

While a police officer was lawfully in defendant’s…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. State v. LotchesOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. WimberOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. NussbaumOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  4. State v. RutleyOregon Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. JenningsOregon Supreme Court · 1929

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. BensonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  2. State v. DotyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  3. State v. ReigardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  4. State v. DotyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  5. State v. PerelliCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API