State v. O'Hara
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, P. J.
Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for first-degree rape, ORS 163.375, and first-degree sexual abuse, ORS 163.427. Defendant assigns error to the trial court’s denial of his motion for a judgment of acquittal on both charges on the ground that the state did not present sufficient evidence of forcible compulsion, a common element of both offenses. Defendant also makes two other assignments of error, which we reject without extended discussion. We affirm.
We review the trial court’s denial of a motion for judgment of acquittal to determine whether, viewing the evidence in the light most…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. MarshallOregon Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
- State v. SpringCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- State v. AlonzoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- State v. LockamyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. GrayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- State v. LedfordCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- State v. BecknerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
- O'Hara v. PremoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
- O'Hara v. KellyDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2020