Legal Opinion

State v. O'Hara

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 18, 2012No. CR0901452; A146327PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, P. J.

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for first-degree rape, ORS 163.375, and first-degree sexual abuse, ORS 163.427. Defendant assigns error to the trial court’s denial of his motion for a judgment of acquittal on both charges on the ground that the state did not present sufficient evidence of forcible compulsion, a common element of both offenses. Defendant also makes two other assignments of error, which we reject without extended discussion. We affirm.

We review the trial court’s denial of a motion for judgment of acquittal to determine whether, viewing the evidence in the light most…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. MarshallOregon Supreme Court · 2011
  2. State v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  3. State v. SpringCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  4. State v. AlonzoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  5. State v. LockamyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. GrayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  2. State v. LedfordCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  3. State v. BecknerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  4. O'Hara v. PremoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  5. O'Hara v. KellyDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API