Legal Opinion

Adjustment Corp. v. Marco

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 13, 1929No. Docket No. 6721PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

Action to recover $2,000, being four months’ rent of certain premises leased to the defendant by Frank McCoy and Florence McCoy, his wife, who by an instrument in writing assigned to the plaintiff their claim therefor. The plaintiff also asked for the sum of $250 as an attorney’s fee for prosecuting the action, the lease between the McCoys and the' defendant having provided that if suit should be brought by the lessors against the defendant to enforce any of their rights under the lease the defendant should become liable for a reasonable attorney’s fee.

The answer of the defendant…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. The Oneida Bank v. . the Ontario BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  2. Goldman v. MurrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Read v. BuffumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Duncan v. HawnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Heisen v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. A. J. Industries, Inc. v. Ver HalenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  2. Dickinson v. Electric Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1935
  3. Miske v. CoxeterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  4. Chinese Hospital Foundation Fund v. PattersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  5. Amalgamated Transit Union v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API