Legal Opinion
Duncan v. Hawn
California Supreme Court
Decided September 5, 1894No. 18176PublishedCited by 21 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtVan Fleet, J.
An act of the legislature entitled “An act to secure the wages of persons employed as laborers on threshing-machines” (Stats. 188.5, p. 109), provides:
“ Section 1. Every person performing work or labor of any kind in, with, about, or upon any threshing-machine, the engine, horse-power, wagons, or appurtenances thereof, while engaged in threshing, shall have a lien upon the same to the extent of the value of his services.
“Sec. 2. The lien herein given shall extend for ten days after the person has ceased such work or labor.
“Sec. 3. If judgment shall he recovered in any action to recover for…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Rollin v. . CrossNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Skyrme v. Occidental Mill & Mining Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1873
- Davis v. BilslandSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Iaege v. BossieuxSupreme Court of Virginia · 1859
- Tuttle v. HoweSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1869
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Bradley v. ChesebroughSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
- First National Bank v. Pomona Tile Manufacturing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1917
- California Portland Cement Co. v. Wentworth Hotel Co.California Court of Appeal · 1911
- Falconio v. LarsenOregon Supreme Court · 1897
- Union Supply Co. v. MorrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.