Gloria S. Carter v. Chrysler Corporation United Auto Workers, Local 110
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MURPHY, Circuit Judge.
Gloria S. Carter, a black woman, sued her employer, Chrysler Corporation, and her union, United Auto Workers, Local 110, under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., and the Missouri Human Rights Act, Mo.Rev.Stat. § 213.010 et seq., for claims of hostile work environment and retaliation. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Chrysler and the union, and Carter appeals. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
I
On a motion for summary judgment, the non-movant’s evidence is to be taken as true and all justifiable inferences are…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by239 opinions
- Jocelyn Whidbee, Shirlene Tranquille v. Garzarelli Food Specialties, Inc., Ed and John Garzarelli, OwnersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Linda Jackson v. Quanex CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Lora Stuart v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
- Tammy S. Scusa v. Nestle U.S. A. Company, Inc., Doing Business as Friskies Petcare Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- Anderson v. Durham D & M, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
234 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.