Legal Opinion
Tammy S. Scusa v. Nestle U.S. A. Company, Inc., Doing Business as Friskies Petcare Co., Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided June 23, 1999No. 98-2866PublishedCited by 234 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McMILLIAN, Circuit Judge.
Tammy S. Scusa appeals from a final order entered in the United States District Court 1 for the District of Nebraska granting summary judgment in favor of appel- lee, Nestle U.S.A. Co., d/b/a Friskies Pet-care Co. (Friskies or the company), and dismissing her claims for sexual harassment and retaliation allegedly committed by her non-supervisory co-workers in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. Scusa v. Nestle U.S.A. Co., No. 4:97CV3134 (D.Neb. July 7, 1998) (memorandum and order).
For reversal, appellant argues…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Phil Quick v. Donaldson Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by234 opinions
- Noviello v. City of BostonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- Lora Stuart v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
- Denise Blomker v. Sally JewellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
- Paula A. Kipp, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Missouri Highway and Transportation Commission, Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
- Deborah L. Schoffstall v. William Henderson, Agent U.S. Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
229 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.