Prichard v. Clay
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MOORE, Justice.
I
In September 1983, Robert L. Clay and Cherie Anderson (hereafter singularly and collectively “Clay”) leased a commercial parcel in Fairbanks from William D. Sexton and Beverly A. Sexton. The 20-year lease contemplated the construction of a fast food restaurant. Taco Bell and Pizza Hut also had leased nearby parcels from the Sextons, so paragraph 6 of the Clay-Sexton lease provided that Clay would not serve or allow another to serve Mexican or Italian food. 1 The Clay lease also provided that Clay could assign the lease if he would “first obtain the written consent…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Peterson v. WirumAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
- Mitford v. De LasalaAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
- Ross v. HardingWashington Supreme Court · 1964
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. O'KELLEYAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
- Jones Associates, Inc. v. Eastside Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Little Susitna Construction Co. v. Soil Processing, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1997
- Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. El Dorado Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
- Jarvis v. EnsmingerAlaska Supreme Court · 2006
- Pennaco Energy, Inc. v. Kd Company Llc, a Wyoming Close Limited Liability CompanyWyoming Supreme Court · 2015
- Laybourn v. City of WasillaAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.