Legal Opinion

Prichard v. Clay

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1989No. S-3038PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MOORE, Justice.

I

In September 1983, Robert L. Clay and Cherie Anderson (hereafter singularly and collectively “Clay”) leased a commercial parcel in Fairbanks from William D. Sexton and Beverly A. Sexton. The 20-year lease contemplated the construction of a fast food restaurant. Taco Bell and Pizza Hut also had leased nearby parcels from the Sextons, so paragraph 6 of the Clay-Sexton lease provided that Clay would not serve or allow another to serve Mexican or Italian food. 1 The Clay lease also provided that Clay could assign the lease if he would “first obtain the written consent…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Peterson v. WirumAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Mitford v. De LasalaAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Ross v. HardingWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. O'KELLEYAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Jones Associates, Inc. v. Eastside Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1985

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Little Susitna Construction Co. v. Soil Processing, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. El Dorado Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
  3. Jarvis v. EnsmingerAlaska Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Pennaco Energy, Inc. v. Kd Company Llc, a Wyoming Close Limited Liability CompanyWyoming Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Laybourn v. City of WasillaAlaska Supreme Court · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API