Millirons v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.
1. (a) Grounds of a motion for a new trial complaining of the refusal to give certain requested instructions raise no question for the consideration of this court where “it does not affirmatively appear that the requests to charge were presented to the court before the jury had retired to consider their verdict. Averments that a ‘written timely request’ was made, or- that a request was made in writing ‘in ample time for the court to consider it,’ or that ‘movant requested the court to give said charge to the jury in ample time,’ are mere conclusions of the pleader and do not come up to the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Dixon v. Sol Loeb Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- Jones v. Western & Atlantic RailroadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919
- Keese v. MizeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
- Monroe v. Warten Cotton Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- Savannah & Southern Railway v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Brinson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965