Legal Opinion

Keese v. Mize

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 18, 1921No. 12609PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Complaint; from Clarke superior court — Judge Fortson. June 11, 1921.

1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, C. J.

1. Under repeated rulings of the Supreme Court and of this court, a special ground of a motion for a new trial must be complete and understandable within itself, and will not be considered where it cannot be understood without a reference to the brief of evidence or some other portion of the record. Under this ruling the first two special grounds of the motion for a new trial, complaining of the admission of specified evidence, cannot be considered, as they are not complete within themselves, and this court is unable to determine, without an examination of other parts of the record, whether…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Jones v. Western & Atlantic RailroadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Trammell v. ShirleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
  2. Dixon v. Sol Loeb Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  3. Downside Risk, Inc. v. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  4. Seaboard Air-Line Railway Co. v. D'AvignonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
  5. Stewart v. AveryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API