Legal Opinion
Dixon v. Sol Loeb Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided November 19, 1923No. 14774PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, C. J.
1. “The existence of a copartnership when once established is presumed, as to third persons, to continue until notice of dissolution has been given that the copartnership no longer exists. Civil Code (1910), §§ 3180, 3179, 3157; Pursley v. Ramsey, 31 Ga. 403, 409; Fleshman v. Collier, 47 Ga. 253, 256, 257; Reliance Fertilizer Co. v. Perry, 23 Ga. App. 580, 583 (99 S. E. 44).” Brady v. Phillips Mule Co., 27 Ga. App. 444 (3) (108 S. E. 809).
2. “The dissolution of a partnership by the retiring of an ostensible partner must be made known to creditors and to the world. The word ‘creditors,’ as…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Jones v. HarrellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Daughtry v. Savannah & Statesboro Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Bush & Hattaway v. McCarty Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- Bush v. FourcherCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- American Cotton College v. Atlanta Newspaper UnionSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Trammell v. ShirleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
- Wood v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
- King v. Mayor &C. of SavannahCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- Klem v. Southeast Ceramics, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- Seaboard Air-Line Railway Co. v. D'AvignonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.