Legal Opinion

Brinson v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 16, 1965No. 41263PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pannell, Judge.

While this court, in applying the rule that grounds of a motion for new trial complaining of the refusal to give certain requested instructions raise no question for consideration by this court where it does not affirmatively appear that the requests to charge were presented to the court before the jury had retired to consider their verdict, has held that averments that a “written timely request” was made, or that a request was made in writing “in ample time for the court to consider it,” or that “movant requested the court to give said charge to the jury in ample time,” are…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Trammell v. ShirleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
  2. Smith v. Satilla Pecan Orchard & Stock Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  3. Dixon v. Sol Loeb Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  4. Haire v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
  5. Keese v. MizeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Alonso v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  2. Brandon v. CoxSupreme Court of Virginia · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API