Savannah & Southern Railway v. Davis
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Action for damages; from Tattnall superior court — Judge Strange presiding. September 3, 1921.
1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.
1. When considered in connection with all the facts of the case (including the amount of the verdict, $2,000) and the entire charge, no error of the court that would require the grant of a new trial appears in any of the excerpts from the charge of which complaint is made in the motion for a new trial.
2. The grounds of the motion which complain that the court refused to comply with certain written requests to charge cannot be considered by this court, for two reasons: (a) It does not appear that these requests were tendered to the court before the jury retired “ to consider of their verdict.”…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Killabrew v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
3Cited by7 opinions
- Trammell v. ShirleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
- West Lumber Co. v. SchnuckCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
- Hightower v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
- Pulliam v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- Millirons v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.