Legal Opinion
Cox v. First National Bank
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 21, 1935No. Civ. 1531PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.
Plaintiff brought this action to recover $1266.67 for unpaid salary, and for salary during vacation periods. The complaint contains three causes of action. The first seeks to recover $300 for salary for one year commencing May 1, 1931, during which time he was paid $200 per month when it was alleged his salary had been fixed 'at $225 per month. The second is to recover $466.67 for salary from January 1 to October 10, 1933, during which time he was paid $150 per month when it was alleged his salary was $200 per month. The third is to recover $500, at the rate of $50 per week, for ten weeks’…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Merchants' Bank v. State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Westervelt v. MohrenstecherCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1896
- United States v. City Bank of ColumbusSupreme Court of the United States · 1859
- Rankin v. TygardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912
- Copeland v. Melrose National BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Kozlowsky v. Westminster National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Aalgaard v. Merchants National Bank, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1990
- Elevator Operators & Starters' Union v. NewmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Floyd v. Jay County Rural Electric Membership Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1980
- Cosgriff v. Duluth Firemen's Relief Assn.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.