Legal Opinion

Copeland v. Melrose National Bank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 11, 1930PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSherman, J.

The contract declared on by plaintiff is the written engagement by defendant (a National bank) to employ him as a vice-president for three years from May 1, 1926, at a salary of $8,000 per annum payable monthly. It provided that in the event that the contract be terminated by the employer prior to the date of expiration, plaintiff should receive as liquidated damages a sum equal to the total compensation which he would receive thereunder for its unexpired .period. Defendant terminated the contract by discharging plaintiff during its term.

Section 5136 of the Revised Statutes of the United…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. California Bank v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. De La Vergne Refrigerating MacHine Co. v. German Savings InstitutionSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  3. Westervelt v. MohrenstecherCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1896
  4. First Nat. Bank of Ottawa v. ConverseSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  5. Rankin v. TygardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Marvin MacKey Lillian MacKey Husband and Wife v. Pioneer National Bank, a National Banking Corporation Paul Campbell, Marie Campbell, Husband and WifeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  2. Bollow v. Federal Reserve Bank of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  3. Bollow v. Federal Reserve BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  4. Peatros v. BANK OF AMERICA NT & SACalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Aalgaard v. Merchants National Bank, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1990

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API