Legal Opinion
Kozlowsky v. Westminster National Bank
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 15, 1970No. Civ. 34087PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FILES, P. J.
This is an action for damages allegedly sustained by plaintiff as a result of his discharge as president of defendant Westminster National Bank. Other defendants include Commercial National Bu ik, into which Westminster merged subsequent to the acts complained of, and. two individuals, Ronald Caspers and Harry Klassman. The superior court sus tained general demurrers to the fifth amended complaint without leave to amend, and dismissed the action. Plaintiff is appealing from that order of dismissal.
Action on the Contract
The first count in the complaint alleges in substance…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Reichert v. General Insurance of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Speegle v. Board of Fire UnderwritersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Imperial Ice Co. v. RossierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Collins v. Vickter Manor, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1957
- Marin v. JacuzziCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Bear Stearns & Co.California Supreme Court · 1990
- Marvin MacKey Lillian MacKey Husband and Wife v. Pioneer National Bank, a National Banking Corporation Paul Campbell, Marie Campbell, Husband and WifeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Reeves v. HanlonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Bollow v. Federal Reserve Bank of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- PMC, Inc. v. Saban Entertainment, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1996
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.