Legal Opinion
Maryland Casualty Co. v. Harvey
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided August 13, 1991No. CX-91-258PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*191OPINION
NORTON, Judge.
Appellant, Maryland Casualty Company (Maryland Casualty), commenced this declaratory judgment action in June 1990 seeking a determination that respondent Paul Harvey’s failure to attend an independent medical examination precluded payment of basic economic loss benefits. The trial court denied Maryland Casualty’s motion and held that the reasonableness of Harvey’s refusal to attend the independent medical examination constituted a factual dispute subject to arbitration. The trial court ordered arbitration. Maryland Casualty appeals. We affirm.
FACTS
On July 27, 1989, Harvey…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bobich v. OjaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Johnson v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Iverson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Petrich Ex Rel. Lee v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Falagian v. Leader National InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Neal v. State Farm Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- Arbitration of Kerber v. Allied Group InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- Neal v. State Farm Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. HarveyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991