Legal Opinion

Arbitration of Kerber v. Allied Group Insurance

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 24, 1994No. C7-94-23PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KALITOWSKI, Judge.

Appellant contends the district court erred in concluding that an arbitrator did not have the authority to require respondent to pay appellant’s expert witness fees.

FACTS

The parties participated in no-fault arbitration pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 65B.525 (1992) to resolve a dispute regarding covered losses. Following arbitration, the arbitrator entered an award requiring respondent to pay appellant, among other sums, $750 for appellant’s expert witness fees.

After the arbitrator denied respondent’s request to modify the award pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 572.16 (1992),…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hibbing Education Ass'n v. Public Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  2. National Indemnity Co. v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  3. Maryland Casualty Co. v. HarveyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Leek v. American Express Property CasualtyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
  2. Anderson v. AMCO Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API