Legal Opinion

Petrich Ex Rel. Lee v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 19, 1988No. CX-87-935PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

POPOVICH, Justice.

Paul Petrich, a minor, brought a declaratory judgment action to determine Hartford Fire Insurance Company’s liability for uninsured motorist benefits. Hartford denied coverage based on a policy exclusion for owned vehicles. The trial court ruled the exclusion invalid, granting summary judgment on the coverage issue for Pet-rich. Hartford appealed, and the Minnesota Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court on this point, though it reversed on another point neither party raises here. Petrich v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co., 414 N.W.2d 558, 561-62 (Minn.App.1987). We reverse.

I

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Myers v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  2. Nygaard v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  3. American Motorist Insurance Co. v. SarvelaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  4. Iverson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  5. DeVille v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Ka Ying Vue v. State Farm Insurance CompaniesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  2. Lynch v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
  3. Schwickert, Inc. v. Winnebago Seniors, Ltd.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  4. Ball Ex Rel. Ball v. Midwestern InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
  5. Wilson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API