Legal Opinion
Wagener v. McDonald
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 7, 1993No. C5-93-804PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HAROLD W. SCHULTZ, Judge.
John S. McDonald contends the district court erred when it determined that legal malpractice claims are assignable and denied summary judgment. The district court certified the question as important and doubtful to this court. We answer the certified question in the affirmative.
FACTS
Paul and Maria Scherber retained John McDonald as their attorney in September 1987. McDonald commenced a land registration action regarding property owned by the Scherbers in Washington County. The district court’s order and decree of registration reflected a 1934 highway easement…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Goodley v. Wank & Wank, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1976
- Picadilly, Inc. v. RaikosIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
- Hedlund Manufacturing Co. v. Weiser, Stapler & SpivakSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Christison v. JonesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
- Thurston v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Kommavongsa v. HaskellWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- MNC Credit Corp. v. SickelsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1998
- Kommavongsa v. HaskellWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- New Hampshire Insurance v. McCannMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
- Can Do, Inc. Pension & Profit Sharing Plan & Successor Plans v. Manier, Herod, Hollabaugh & SmithTennessee Supreme Court · 1996
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.