Legal Opinion

Can Do, Inc. Pension & Profit Sharing Plan & Successor Plans v. Manier, Herod, Hollabaugh & Smith

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1996No. 01S01-9501-CH-00013PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANDERSON, Chief Justice.

This case presents a question of first impression in Tennessee: whether or not a legal malpractice claim is assignable. We have determined that sound public policy reasons militate against allowing assignment of legal malpractice actions. We, therefore, reverse the Court of Appeals and dismiss the complaint.

BACKGROUND

This appeal arises from the trial court’s grant of the defendant law firm’s motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim. Accordingly, the facts as alleged in the complaint must be taken as true, and are as follows.

George W. Holder,…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Goodley v. Wank & Wank, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1976
  2. Picadilly, Inc. v. RaikosIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Petition of BursonTennessee Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Hedlund Manufacturing Co. v. Weiser, Stapler & SpivakSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Christison v. JonesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. SunTrust Bank, Nashville v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
  2. MNC Credit Corp. v. SickelsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1998
  3. New Hampshire Insurance v. McCannMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
  4. State v. OakleyTexas Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Gurski v. Rosenblum and Filan, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API